World Cup vs Olympics: Which Event Is Bigger?
World Cup vs Olympics comparison has existed ever since the start of both sporting events. It is one that stirs up a lot of passion in people on both sides. Which is bigger? depends on a variety of factors. These are a few of the numerous factors that need to be considered, and we will examine them in this article today.
READ: Champions League vs Premier League: Which Is the Best?
Comparison chart
| Olympic Games | World Cup | |
| Year of start | 1896 | 1930 |
| Schedule | There’s always a chance FIFA won’t let some of the athletes compete because of commitments in other leagues. | Following the completion of all other domestic and international competitions and when all players are available, the Cup is played. |
| Number of Countries Involved | 16 | 32 |
| Competition | Young players are still getting the hang of the game and testing the waters of international competition, therefore the competition is much milder. | The tournament has a significantly tougher field of competitors. The stakes are substantially higher for both the players and the viewers. |
| Age Requirements | No more than three players older than 24 are permitted on any given national team. | Such limitations do not apply to the league, allowing elder soccer players to compete in the competition. |
| Roster Size | Each Olympic team is permitted to bring 18 players. | Each national team participating in this tournament is permitted to bring a squad of 23 players to the event. |
| Prestige | Every member of the winning soccer team receives a medal and can take it home with them. | The champion team not only receives medals but also gets to keep the trophy till the following competition. |
READ: Copa America vs Euro Cup: What Is The Difference?
Olympic Soccer vs World Cup: Players and Participation
The Fifa Cup is a goal for the majority of soccer players worldwide. It is more than enough to satisfy any player’s soul to be granted the opportunity to participate in a game during this tournament against some of the top national teams in the world.
A whole different degree of success—one that not many get to experience—is achieved by competing in the finals and winning the competition. Players defy their management and leave their clubs during the FIFA Cup.
It’s a whole different story from Olympic soccer. This competition offers young players a great opportunity to demonstrate their skill, but it doesn’t have much to offer players who are close to the 24-year age limit.
If there are still games to be played in their team’s league, FIFA even goes so far as to prevent some of the elite players from competing in the Olympics.
In terms of soccer Olympics vs World Cup players’ enthusiasm, loyalty, and eagerness to compete, the FIFA Cup is stronger than the Olympic soccer competition. We soccer fans live for the Fifa Cup, despite the fact that Olympic soccer can be a fun way to pass a week of time every fourth summer.
Nothing can compare to the feeling of seeing those 32 countries clash and fight for a month. There is no greater pleasure than seeing the greatest of the best compete for the chance to hoist the Fifa Cup Trophy.
World Cup vs Olympics Viewership
There are reportedly about 4 billion soccer fans worldwide. Out of that total, more than 3.5 billion people set aside time to watch the World Cup’s championship match, with more than a billion people tuning in live on TVs and other screens.
The average of this league game draws more than 190 million spectators, as was previously indicated. Remember that there are twice as many games played during the Fifa Cup as there are during the Olympics, making the average viewership all the more amazing.
Comparing the two tournaments, more people watch the Olympics than the World Cup, with 3.6 billion viewers worldwide. The 42 sports and disciplines that make up the Olympics are broken up into this total.
As we’ve already seen, there aren’t many soccer enthusiasts who are eager to devote their time to watching Olympic soccer. The FIFA World Cup is vastly greater than Olympic Soccer in terms of viewership.
READ: NFC vs AFC: What Is The Difference?
Olympics vs World Cup revenue
If we use the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Russia as a point of comparison once more, we can see that FIFA earned about $6 billion during the event. Around $12 billion was invested in the competition overall. FIFA allocated $791 million in total for the competing teams and athletes. The prize fund, reimbursements, insurance, and preparations are all included in this sum. At the conclusion of the last competition, the winning team received $38 million.
We can consider a variety of data when discussing Olympic revenue, but we will never match the figures from the Fifa Cup:
Beijing spent $40 billion on infrastructure in 2008, but the Olympics only brought in $3.6 billion. London spent $18 billion organizing the Olympics in 2012, yet the official revenue was only $5.2 billion.
Once more, bear in mind that 41 other sports are included in the revenue in addition to soccer. Olympic gold medal winners often receive $37,500 in rewards.
Again, the FIFA World Cup triumphs over the Olympics and Olympic soccer because it generates more money, cost less money upfront, and offers better rewards for the champions.
Conclusion
The FIFA Cup is more significant than Olympic soccer in practically every way, according to the only conclusive response to this topic based on the certain instances shown above.
That comes to the end of our World Cup vs Olympics competition, you can see more in the same article “Europa League vs Champions League“. Don’t forget to follow us on Sporting difference to discuss more information on football topics and discover more typical comparisons!
